Monday, November 9, 2009

"Stitch Bitch"

After my initial read of "Stitch Bitch" I didn't know what to make of it. I was confused to say the least. But after class today I think I'm finally beginning to grasp what Shelley Jackson is writing about. When I originally read "Stitch Bitch" I missed the whole reference to Frankenstein. And now that I know that crucial allusion, the rest of what Shelley Jackson writes is much clearer. This may not be the point Jackson is intending to make, but this is what I interpreted from it. The title "Stitch Bitch" is referring to the making of Frankenstein. That's an obvious one. Frankenstein was sewn together out of different body parts. But that metaphor of the body is a reoccurring metaphor in Jackson's piece. She compares the human body to writing, to hypertext. "But hypertext provides a body, a vaporous sort of insufficiently tactile body but a body, for our experience of the beauty of relationships." Frankenstein was made up of body parts from other people all sewn together to create this monster. Writing is a sewn together body in a way, each limb representing an influence from someone else. Plagiarism. The works of one writer influences another, and this is done so much more now that we are writing in the digital age, in hypertext. The writer didn't produce their works from only their own thoughts, it's impossible. The writings were produced from a sewn together body, a stitched bitch perhaps? But Shelley Jackson doesn't mean "bitch" in a negative way. It's simply a literal meaning. She intends to say that it is a good thing to be a sewn together body, composed of other writers' works. Frankenstein was a monster, but Shelley Jackson ultimately concludes by writing:
"A beaker of imaginal secretions makes us all desire's monsters, which is what we ought to be."

2 comments:

  1. Carson! I missed the reference to frankenstein the first time too, but you are right it is the best metaphore in this article. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by bitch not being used in a negative way, but I definatly agree because it is obvious that it wasn't meant how we were discussing in class. Writing and the body work well for her article, because piece by piece you create your work, and frankenstein's body being created is like the writing being written.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I totally missed that reference too...haha. Now the article actually makes kind of sense. It's still a little confusing. But I really like how you explain it! It's much easier to understand your explanation than the original. Your ideas seem to make sense...I especially like this part: "Writing is a sewn together body in a way, each limb representing an influence from someone else. Plagiarism."

    Stated clearly. Easy to understand. Perfect! :)

    ReplyDelete